Latest Research

It’s worth considering that “this time” is not different. In fact, this time and may well be the same as it ever was, and the recent stock market collapse could morph into a perfectly normal cyclical bear market. Based on the average loss of the last 13 (non-recessionary) bear markets, SPX could drop to 4,153. 

Prior to Liberation Day, there was growing talk of a new bull market in a practice that had not experienced one  in years: Diversification. After being in the green all year until recently, our simple proxy for a diversified portfolio is now down 2.1%, but compared to the domestic equity benchmarks, that seems rather palatable.   

There’s been an intriguing relationship between the speed of a severe decline and the likelihood of a strong recovery. Yet, the cyclical backdrop is also a key factor, and today’s message from a range of economic measures is that the current correction is not a safe one to buy.

On April 4th, the S&P 500’s loss from its February 19th high reached -17.4%, a decline we’d consider a “severe correction”… if we thought it had fully run its course.

The stock market declines of April 3rd and 4th were a mass liquidation with no distinguishing between Growth or Value. Still, there are signs that a rotation from the former to the latter is underway. And keep in mind that the most reliable catalyst for a transition in leadership is a bear market.

The gap between the ISM Manufacturing Price Index and the New Orders Index has blown out to dangerous levels, indicating that price increases are outstripping growth in orders—a stagflationary condition historically detrimental to stock prices. 

The risk is now extremely high that the breakdown in confidence will become self-fulfilling. The near 30-point collapse in Consumer Expectations from the post-election high could translate into a reduction in real-GDP growth of more than two percentage points over the next year.

The stock market losses in 2025 have materialized so rapidly that many investors might feel trapped, hoping for a bounce that provides better exit prices. The challenge may be that an imminent bounce and the “new narrative” to support it will seem so compelling that the urge to exit may dissipate.

The market decline will almost certainly be accompanied by a recession. For months we’ve maintained that the wealth effect had become the main support of an expansion whose list of beneficiaries had been narrowing like that of stock breadth and leadership. The administration’s draconian tariffs will deserve some blame, but it’s not partisan to underscore that the expansion was on precarious footing long before the Tariff Tantrum.

A synopsis of ten historical bubbles, with price charts detailing the scope and duration of each, beginning prior to the onset of the hysteria through the aftermath of the bursting of the bubble. At the end of these cycles, the asset typically returns to the base trend in place before the insanity took hold. These quick anecdotes may be of particular interest to those whose tenure as professional investors has not yet reached the quarter-century mark.

The strategy sold Airlines and Apparel Retail and put the proceeds into a defensive basket consisting of Data Processing & Outsourced Services and Gas Utilities.

March marked the second consecutive month of historically poor growth performance, capping the worst back-to-back stretch since the global financial crisis. While low volatility and value surged, growth and momentum were hit hard—raising big questions about how much downside remains and whether safety now comes at too steep a price.

Within fixed income, we remain defensive toward credit, especially the low quality segment.

Uncertainty surrounding Trump’s second term and the risk of escalating tariffs have shifted market focus from inflation to growth, raising fresh concerns about a potential recession. Our updated Recession Dashboard shows a delicate balance, with risk now slightly above 50%—driven largely by weakness in equities and full-time employment. While some indicators have improved, the market remains the most important signal to watch. A sharp selloff could tip the economy from slowdown into recession territory.

Read this week's Major Trend

S&P 500 performance turned negative in the first quarter of 2025 and factor returns responded as expected. Defensive factors including Low Volatility and dividend-focused styles produced positive returns, and Value managed to eke out a tiny gain.

The S&P 500’s March loss was its worst since December 2022. The Q1 decline broke the index’s streak of five consecutive quarterly advances. Still, downside to median levels remains substantial: -38% based on 1957-to-date history; -25% using data from 1995-present.

The Magnificent Malignant Seven posted an average return of -16% in Q1, with META (-2%) being the only firm not down double digits to start 2025. These plow horses of the past two years contributed all of the Q1 loss (and then some) for the Cap Weighted S&P 500 (-4.3%). Outside of the $2.8 trillion market-cap damage from those firms, the Equal Weighted S&P 500 was just about flat for Q1.

Royal Blue Value, our mega-cap value proxy, was the only style box in positive territory for Q1, turning in an impressive 7% gain. Relative to RB Growth (-5%), RB Value had its best quarter since Q1-22.

Up markets or down markets, Small Caps have chronically underperformed Large Caps over the past three years. Why hasn’t the Ratio of Ratios continued to move farther south instead of sideways? Despite the relative weakness in the “P” for Small Caps, the shrinking “E” means the P/E ratio stays elevated.